[PATCH v2 1/4] Document the semantics of hideRefs with namespaces

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Right now, there is no clear definition of how transfer.hideRefs should
behave when a namespace is set. Explain that hideRefs prefixes match
stripped names in that case. This is how hideRefs patterns are currently
handled in receive-pack.

Signed-off-by: Lukas Fleischer <lfleischer@xxxxxxx>
---
 Documentation/config.txt | 7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/config.txt b/Documentation/config.txt
index 1204072..3da97a1 100644
--- a/Documentation/config.txt
+++ b/Documentation/config.txt
@@ -2684,6 +2684,13 @@ You may also include a `!` in front of the ref name to negate the entry,
 explicitly exposing it, even if an earlier entry marked it as hidden.
 If you have multiple hideRefs values, later entries override earlier ones
 (and entries in more-specific config files override less-specific ones).
++
+If a namespace is set, references are stripped before matching. For example, if
+the prefix `refs/heads/master` is specified in `transfer.hideRefs` and the
+current namespace is `foo`, then `refs/namespaces/foo/refs/heads/master` is
+omitted from the advertisements but `refs/heads/master` and
+`refs/namespaces/bar/refs/heads/master` are still advertised as so-called
+"have" lines.
 
 transfer.unpackLimit::
 	When `fetch.unpackLimit` or `receive.unpackLimit` are
-- 
2.6.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]