On 3/21/07, Eygene Ryabinkin <rea-git@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 03:38:53PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > >> I am happening to develop on some machines on which I have no > >> X-Windows or any GUI providers at all, so I prefer not to have the > >> Tcl/Tk dependency at all. > > > > If you don't do something, it is often interesting to state why: if you > > don't install something to prevent a dependency you don't want to have, it > > is different from saying that you do not want to have a GUI, _even if_ the > > dependency is there already. > > I read his message as "these are useless for me, so why introduce a > useless dependency?" The "effect" is to have no Tcl dependence, > but the original reason is to have no GUI. Yep, you're right. That was I meant originally. How do you feel about NO_GUI or NO_TCL names?
That'd be NO_TCL_TK. TCL has nothing to do with graphics. And you have one more supporter for NO_GUI (my server has no usable graphics, will never have and runs cron jobs with git in them). - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html