Re: [PATCH 3/6] Facilitate debugging Git executables in tests with gdb

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Oct 2015, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>> On Mon, 26 Oct 2015, Jonathan Nieder wrote:

>>> Does the 'exec' after the fi need this as well?  exec is supposed to
>>> itself print a message and exit when it runs into an error.
[...]
> Actually, after reading the patch again, I think it is better to be less
> intrusive and add the error message *just* for the gdb case, as it is
> right now:

Why?  Unlike the C library function of the same name, the shell
builtin 'exec' prints an error message and exits on error.

Sorry for the lack of clarity,
Jonathan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]