Re: [PATCH 2/6] remote-http(s): Support SOCKS proxies

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Mon, 26 Oct 2015, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> James McCoy <vega.james@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> >> The code looks OK but the last paragraph makes _us_ worried.  What
> >> is the licensing status of the original at SO?
> >
> > According to Stackoverflow[0],
> >
> >   As noted in the Stack Exchange Terms of Service[1] and in the footer of
> >   every page, all user contributions are licensed under Creative Commons
> >   Attribution-Share Alike[2]. Proper attribution[3] is required if you
> >   republish any Stack Exchange content.
> >
> > [0]: https://stackoverflow.com/help/licensing
> 
> Yes, and (please correct me if I am wrong--this is one of the times
> I hope I am wrong!) I thought BY-SA does not mesh well with GPLv2,
> in which case we cannot use this patch (instead somebody has to
> reimplement the same without copying).

Pat, could you please allow us to insert your SOB?

Thanks,
Dscho
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]