On 15 Oct 2015, at 10:12, Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Lars Schneider <larsxschneider@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> I was reluctant to this because I feared problems. Especially while >> running tests in parallel. > > Isn't the point of using a CI tool to notice problems? ;-) > > More seriously, running tests in parallel shouldn't be a problem since > each test runs in its own directory with HOME set to this private > directory, so two diffent tests should not interfer. If there's an issue > with parallel tests, we probably prefer discovering them than avoiding > them. OK. Great! >> make -j2 9min 11sec: >> https://travis-ci.org/larsxschneider/git/jobs/85478022 >> >> make 17min 20sec: >> https://travis-ci.org/larsxschneider/git/jobs/85432398 > > Since the tests are essentially IO-bound and not CPU-bound, it may even > make sense to use -j3 here. Hehe you're right. make -j3 6min 2sec https://travis-ci.org/larsxschneider/git/jobs/85497307 just for fun I tried a few more values and -j5 seems to be the best with 4min 27sec https://travis-ci.org/larsxschneider/git/jobs/85501015 -j6 is slower again. Do you see a reason not to use "-j5"? Thanks, Lars -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html