Re: [PATCH 06/26] mailinfo: always pass "line" as an argument

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 4:16 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Some functions in this module accessed the global "struct strbuf
> line" while many others used a strbuf passed as an argument.
> Convert the former to ensure that nobody deeper in the callchains
> relies on the global one.
>
> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  builtin/mailinfo.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
>  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/builtin/mailinfo.c b/builtin/mailinfo.c
> index 5a74811..c3c7d67 100644
> --- a/builtin/mailinfo.c
> +++ b/builtin/mailinfo.c
> @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ static FILE *cmitmsg, *patchfile, *fin, *fout;
>  static int keep_subject;
>  static int keep_non_patch_brackets_in_subject;
>  static const char *metainfo_charset;
> -static struct strbuf line = STRBUF_INIT;
> +static struct strbuf line_global = STRBUF_INIT;
>  static struct strbuf name = STRBUF_INIT;
>  static struct strbuf email = STRBUF_INIT;
>  static char *message_id;
> @@ -817,23 +817,23 @@ static void handle_filter(struct strbuf *line, int *filter_stage, int *header_st
>         }
>  }
>
> -static int find_boundary(void)
> +static int find_boundary(struct strbuf *line)
>  {
> -       while (!strbuf_getline(&line, fin, '\n')) {
> -               if (*content_top && is_multipart_boundary(&line))
> +       while (!strbuf_getline(line, fin, '\n')) {
> +               if (*content_top && is_multipart_boundary(line))
>                         return 1;
>         }
>         return 0;
>  }
>
> -static int handle_boundary(int *filter_stage, int *header_stage)
> +static int handle_boundary(struct strbuf *line, int *filter_stage, int *header_stage)
>  {
>         struct strbuf newline = STRBUF_INIT;
>
>         strbuf_addch(&newline, '\n');
>  again:
> -       if (line.len >= (*content_top)->len + 2 &&
> -           !memcmp(line.buf + (*content_top)->len, "--", 2)) {
> +       if (line->len >= (*content_top)->len + 2 &&
> +           !memcmp(line->buf + (*content_top)->len, "--", 2)) {
>                 /* we hit an end boundary */
>                 /* pop the current boundary off the stack */
>                 strbuf_release(*content_top);
> @@ -852,7 +852,7 @@ again:
>                 strbuf_release(&newline);
>
>                 /* skip to the next boundary */
> -               if (!find_boundary())
> +               if (!find_boundary(line))
>                         return 0;
>                 goto again;
>         }
> @@ -862,18 +862,18 @@ again:
>         strbuf_reset(&charset);
>
>         /* slurp in this section's info */
> -       while (read_one_header_line(&line, fin))
> -               check_header(&line, p_hdr_data, 0);
> +       while (read_one_header_line(line, fin))
> +               check_header(line, p_hdr_data, 0);
>
>         strbuf_release(&newline);
>         /* replenish line */
> -       if (strbuf_getline(&line, fin, '\n'))
> +       if (strbuf_getline(line, fin, '\n'))
>                 return 0;
> -       strbuf_addch(&line, '\n');
> +       strbuf_addch(line, '\n');
>         return 1;
>  }
>
> -static void handle_body(void)
> +static void handle_body(struct strbuf *line)
>  {
>         struct strbuf prev = STRBUF_INIT;
>         int filter_stage = 0;
> @@ -881,24 +881,24 @@ static void handle_body(void)
>
>         /* Skip up to the first boundary */
>         if (*content_top) {
> -               if (!find_boundary())
> +               if (!find_boundary(line))
>                         goto handle_body_out;
>         }
>
>         do {
>                 /* process any boundary lines */
> -               if (*content_top && is_multipart_boundary(&line)) {
> +               if (*content_top && is_multipart_boundary(line)) {
>                         /* flush any leftover */
>                         if (prev.len) {
>                                 handle_filter(&prev, &filter_stage, &header_stage);
>                                 strbuf_reset(&prev);
>                         }
> -                       if (!handle_boundary(&filter_stage, &header_stage))
> +                       if (!handle_boundary(line, &filter_stage, &header_stage))
>                                 goto handle_body_out;
>                 }
>
>                 /* Unwrap transfer encoding */
> -               decode_transfer_encoding(&line);
> +               decode_transfer_encoding(line);
>
>                 switch (transfer_encoding) {
>                 case TE_BASE64:
> @@ -907,7 +907,7 @@ static void handle_body(void)
>                         struct strbuf **lines, **it, *sb;
>
>                         /* Prepend any previous partial lines */
> -                       strbuf_insert(&line, 0, prev.buf, prev.len);
> +                       strbuf_insert(line, 0, prev.buf, prev.len);
>                         strbuf_reset(&prev);
>
>                         /*
> @@ -915,7 +915,7 @@ static void handle_body(void)
>                          * multiple new lines.  Pass only one chunk
>                          * at a time to handle_filter()
>                          */
> -                       lines = strbuf_split(&line, '\n');
> +                       lines = strbuf_split(line, '\n');
>                         for (it = lines; (sb = *it); it++) {
>                                 if (*(it + 1) == NULL) /* The last line */
>                                         if (sb->buf[sb->len - 1] != '\n') {
> @@ -933,10 +933,10 @@ static void handle_body(void)
>                         break;
>                 }
>                 default:
> -                       handle_filter(&line, &filter_stage, &header_stage);
> +                       handle_filter(line, &filter_stage, &header_stage);
>                 }
>
> -       } while (!strbuf_getwholeline(&line, fin, '\n'));
> +       } while (!strbuf_getwholeline(line, fin, '\n'));
>
>  handle_body_out:
>         strbuf_release(&prev);
> @@ -1019,10 +1019,10 @@ static int mailinfo(FILE *in, FILE *out, const char *msg, const char *patch)
>         ungetc(peek, in);
>
>         /* process the email header */
> -       while (read_one_header_line(&line, fin))
> -               check_header(&line, p_hdr_data, 1);
> +       while (read_one_header_line(&line_global, fin))
> +               check_header(&line_global, p_hdr_data, 1);

This is the only function to use line_global if I see correctly.
The function is called only once, so no need to preserve state
outside the function. Would it make sense to remove line_global
completely and have a local variable in this function instead?

>
> -       handle_body();
> +       handle_body(&line_global);
>         handle_info();
>
>         return 0;
> --
> 2.6.1-320-g86a1181
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]