Stefan Beller <sbeller@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Compare to a patch[1] I sent a while back and the discussion on it. > > [1] https://www.mail-archive.com/git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg70474.html It is not clear what conclusion you want others to draw from the comparison, I am afraid. I am guessing that you are in favor of dropping this patch, because 'int' that signals success or error is the most natural return type and meanint for this function if its callers ever start using the value as the indication of an error, just like in the old thread, the return value from get_remote_heads() had the most useful type and the meaning for its callers if they wanted to use it. And if that is what you wanted to say, I fully agree with the conclusion. By the way, it is not a very good comparison, though. The patch in the old thread deliberately attempted to discard a useful piece of information. The information the patch in this thread attempts to discard is not so useful, as there currently is nobody that returns an error in the codepath. So in that sense, the patch in this thread to change the return value to void is a bit more justifiable than the one in the old thread, I think. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html