On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Roberto Tyley <roberto.tyley@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Given this, enabling Travis CI for git/git seems pretty low risk, > are there any strong objections to it happening? I still don't see a reason why git/git needs to be the one that is used, when somebody so interested (and I seem to see very many of them in the thread) can sacrifice his or her own fork and enable it him or herself. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html