On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 5:02 AM, Ramsay Jones
<ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Commits 0fc1fdb0 ("fetch_populated_submodules: use new parallel job
> processing", 28-09-2015) and 60f24f52 ("run-command: add an asynchronous
> parallel child processor", 28-09-2015) both introduce external symbols
> which only require file scope visibility. In order to reduce the
> visibility, apply the static keyword to their declarations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> Hi Stefan,
>
> No, despite the same subject, this is not the same patch that I sent
> you last week! :-D
>
> Could you please squash parts of this into the patches corresponding
> to the above mentioned commits.
I am sorry for the need to send this second patch. :(
>
> Thanks!
>
> BTW, I would once again suggest that you could move the definition of
> get_next_submodule() to be above/before fetch_populated_submodules()
> so that you can remove the forward declaration.
>
> ATB,
> Ramsay Jones
>
> run-command.c | 2 +-
> submodule.c | 8 ++++----
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/run-command.c b/run-command.c
> index 341b23b..347d22e 100644
> --- a/run-command.c
> +++ b/run-command.c
> @@ -865,7 +865,7 @@ int capture_command(struct child_process *cmd, struct strbuf *buf, size_t hint)
> return finish_command(cmd);
> }
>
> -struct parallel_processes {
> +static struct parallel_processes {
will pickup in a reroll
> void *data;
>
> int max_processes;
> diff --git a/submodule.c b/submodule.c
> index bd6e208..638efb5 100644
> --- a/submodule.c
> +++ b/submodule.c
> @@ -622,8 +622,8 @@ struct submodule_parallel_fetch {
> };
> #define SPF_INIT {0, ARGV_ARRAY_INIT, NULL, NULL, 0, 0, 0}
>
> -int get_next_submodule(void *data, struct child_process *cp,
> - struct strbuf *err);
> +static int get_next_submodule(void *data, struct child_process *cp,
> + struct strbuf *err);
I thought I had this in yesterdays reroll (v6). Oh you're referring to
the version
from the 28th (I forgot to label them v5 I suppose).
I will also get rid of the forward declaration.
>
> static int fetch_start_failure(void *data, struct child_process *cp,
> struct strbuf *err)
> @@ -682,8 +682,8 @@ out:
> return spf.result;
> }
>
> -int get_next_submodule(void *data, struct child_process *cp,
> - struct strbuf *err)
> +static int get_next_submodule(void *data, struct child_process *cp,
> + struct strbuf *err)
> {
> int ret = 0;
> struct submodule_parallel_fetch *spf = data;
> --
> 2.6.0
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html