[PATCH 0/2] Another squash on run-command: add an asynchronous parallel child processor

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Here is another proposal for squashing.
It's basically both squash proposals by Junio, plus another issues I think
should be done right from the beginning.

 [added by sb:]
 * If you do not die() in start_failure_fn or return_value_fn, you
   don't want to write to stderr directly as you would destroy the fine
   ordering of the processes output. So make the err strbuf available in
   both these functions, and make sure the strbuf is appended to the
   buffered output in both cases.

Stefan Beller (2):
  SQUASH???
  SQUASH for "fetch_populated_submodules: use new parallel job
    processing"

-- 
2.5.0.273.g6fa2560.dirty

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]