On Tue, 2015-09-22 at 13:40 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> How about phrasing it totally differently?
>
> The ref specifies the full refname when it begins with
> `refs/notes/`; otherwise `ref/notes/` is prefixed to form a
> full name of the ref.
>
> I think that would remove the need to illustrate with concrete
> examples like refs/heads/blah.
>
Wait, what about the DWIM of notes/<name> goes to refs/notes/<name>..
do we need to explain that here? it might seem that "notes/foo" ends up
as "refs/notes/notes/foo" which is not really what we mean.
Regards,
Jake��.n��������+%������w��{.n��������n�r������&��z�ޗ�zf���h���~����������_��+v���)ߣ�