Re: [RFH] straightening out "read-tree -m"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Steven Grimm <koreth@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On my to-do list for next week is to try to come up with a minimally
> complex test case to demonstrate the problem, as the actual
> repositories in question are pretty convoluted and there were a bunch
> of other unrelated changes. I didn't mention it before now because I
> knew my description was certain to be too vague to be useful without a
> test case to look at.

You are free to come up with test case, but I have a feeling
that the problem is already well understood (and that is why the
last part of my RFH matters a lot more than the former "case
table").  In short, "read-tree -m" (and unpack-trees) is screwy
in the presense of D/F conflicts.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]