Re: [PATCH 04/67] fsck: don't fsck alternates for connectivity-only check

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@xxxxxx> writes:

> Hi Peff,
>
> On 2015-09-15 17:24, Jeff King wrote:
>> Commit 02976bf (fsck: introduce `git fsck --connectivity-only`,
>> 2015-06-22) recently gave fsck an option to perform only a
>> subset of the checks, by skipping the fsck_object_dir()
>> call. However, it does so only for the local object
>> directory, and we still do expensive checks on any alternate
>> repos. We should skip them in this case, too.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx>
>
> ACK!

Thanks, both.

Peff, I am inclined to take at least 1 and 4 outside the context of
this series and queue them on their own topics.  I do not think
either is too urgent to be in 2.6, but on the other hand they look
both trivially correct (that is a famous last word that often comes
back and haunt us, though), so...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]