Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 5:56 PM, Matthieu Moy
> <Matthieu.Moy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>>> /* Print detached HEAD before sorting and printing the rest */
>>> - if (detached) {
>>> - print_ref_item(&ref_list.list[index - 1], maxwidth, verbose, abbrev,
>>> - detached, remote_prefix);
>>> - index -= 1;
>>> + if (filter->kind & FILTER_REFS_DETACHED_HEAD) {
>>> + print_ref_item(array.items[array.nr - 1], maxwidth, filter, remote_prefix);
>>> + free_array_item(array.items[array.nr - 1]);
>>> + array.nr--;
>>
>> Ah, this answers my previous remark: indeed, you are removing the
>> element from the array completely after this patch. You may want to
>> modify the previous patch to start doing it earlier, but I think it's
>> not worth the trouble: I agree with the final state, only the
>> intermediate state is suboptimal (but still acceptable to me at least).
>
> Yes! Eric suggested this. It doesn't make much sense in the previous
> patch, cause I'd have to introduce something along the lines of
> free_array_item() only to be removed/replaced here.
OK, it makes sense.
--
Matthieu Moy
http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html