Re: [PATCH/RFC] Pinning of submodules

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 07.09.2015 um 01:43 schrieb Eric Sunshine:
On Sun, Sep 6, 2015 at 6:08 PM, Anders Ro <anders.ronnbrant@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 04/09/15 07:02, Eric Sunshine wrote:
On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 7:34 PM, Anders Ro <anders.ronnbrant@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
git-submodule.sh: pin submodule when branch name is '@'

Setting branch name to '@' for a submodule will disable 'git submodule
update --remote' calls for that specific submodule. I.e. instead of
follow the unspecified default choice of master, nothing is being
updated. This is useful when multiple submodules exist but not all
should follow the remote branch head.

With the disclaimer that I'm not a submodule user (to which the
answer might be obvious): What benefit is there in using a magic
value like this ("@") over, say, an explicit configuration setting?

 From what I have understood (not a submodule expert yet) the '@' is an
invalid branch name and should therefore not collide with any current
branches. My idea was to disable the '--remote' option when the user
have explicitly set an invalid branch name to not modify any current
behaviour. Though having an explicit option is of course more
clarifying. The current behaviour though is that empty branch name means
"follow master" which is somewhat unintuitive.

My concern in asking was that some future person might come up with
another scenario which also wants to use a "magic value" and would
have to invent / arrive at another "illegal" representation. Hence, an
explicit setting might be more appropriate. However, as stated, I
don't even use submodules, so I may be far off the mark. I've cc'd a
few of the submodule maintainers with the hope that they will chime
in.

Added Trevor to the CC, who is the original author of --remote (see
06b1abb5b).

While I believe that adding such functionality makes perfect sense,
I do not find it terribly obvious that setting the branch to '@' will
make --remote skip this submodule. I wouldn't care so much if we'd
only use this value internally, but this is user visible (and has to
be set by the user if she wants to skip a submodule in --remote).

Setting the branch to an empty value feels a bit more natural, but
I'm not so sure our config handling supports that well (we seem to
assume in quite some places that empty equals unset). So I tend to
prefer a new option for that.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]