Re: [PATCH] t7300: fix broken && chains

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



erik elfström <erik.elfstrom@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 6:58 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> ...  It may have been
>> better if you didn't do "while we are here" and corrected only the
>> &&-chain in patch 1/2 and then updated the style of the tests to
>> take advantage of the newer facilities recent test-lib has in a
>> separate patch 2/2, but this will do at least for now.
>>
>> Will queue.
>>
>> Thanks.
>
> I can do a re-roll with the chain fix in the first patch and a more
> thorough modernization of t7300 in separate patches if you'd like? I
> almost went this way for v1 but decided to limit the scope for the
> first version.

I'd say it is too much work for something that we already have
reviewed and queued ;-) Let's have this patch as-is.

Modernization and clean-up from time to time is a good thing to do,
but we only have limited review bandwidth, so let's not overdo it.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]