Re: [PATCH v3] gc: save log from daemonized gc --auto and print it next time

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 12:49 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy  <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> While commit 9f673f9 (gc: config option for running --auto in
>> background - 2014-02-08) helps reduce some complaints about 'gc
>> --auto' hogging the terminal, it creates another set of problems.
>>
>> The latest in this set is, as the result of daemonizing, stderr is
>> closed and all warnings are lost. This warning at the end of cmd_gc()
>> is particularly important because it tells the user how to avoid "gc
>> --auto" running repeatedly. Because stderr is closed, the user does
>> not know, naturally they complain about 'gc --auto' wasting CPU.
>>
>> Daemonized gc now saves stderr to $GIT_DIR/gc.log. Following gc runs
>> will not be daemonized and gc.log printed out until the user removes
>> gc.log.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  Let's try again. Compared to v2 [1], this version does not delete
>>  gc.log automatically any more. The user needs to take action, then
>>  delete gc.log to bring it background again.
>
> Sounds a bit more sensible, but I wonder if it is a good idea to
> keep going in the first place.  If the last gc run reported an
> issue, would it make it likely that we would hit the same issue?
>
> An alternative design I have in mind is to exit "gc --auto" with
> success without doing anything, after giving the new warning
> message.  What would be the pros-and-cons between this patch and
> that alternative design?

I think the alt. design is better. If anything, keep runing may
produce more output and probably distract the user from the real
warning. We only want to keep doing something again if it can gain us
something. If we succeed at steps A and B, then fail at C. Doing A and
B again next time might be worth something in general, but given the
context of git-gc I don't think it is.
-- 
Duy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]