Re: [FEATURE REQUEST] Filter-branch extend progress with a simple estimated time remaning

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,

Here's what I ended up using, and seemed to work well:
https://github.com/gaborbernat/git/commit/766841bc1b726a5d6e7e051938b82975368695a0

Does this looks okay, should I create a patch from this?

Thanks,
Bernát GÁBOR


On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 4:15 AM, Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 04:12:54PM -0400, Eric Sunshine wrote:
>
>> > A little googling came up with:
>> >
>> >     awk 'END { print systime() }' </dev/null
>> >
>> > which probably (?) works everywhere.
>>
>> On Mac OS X and FreeBSD:
>>
>>     $ awk 'END { print systime() }' </dev/null
>>     awk: calling undefined function systime
>>     source line number 1
>>     $
>
> Oh, well. The reference I saw was that the old Kernighan nawk had it,
> but that seems not to be the case:
>
>   http://www.cs.princeton.edu/~bwk/btl.mirror/
>
> "date +%s" seems to work on OS X, and so presumably on other BSDs. No
> clue what would work on stuff like SunOS, AIX, etc.
>
> -Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]