Re: cleaner/better zlib sources?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Friday 16 March 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> (Btw, to get this level of detail, you need to link statically, at least 
> if you are using Fedora Core. If you do the normal dynamic linking, 
> oprofile will not be able to show you which function, and will just say 
> that 50% of all time was spent in libz.so.1.2.3).

I see the same here on OpenSuse 10.2.
This is because opreport currently does not take symbols from the dynamic
symbol table into account. Patching the symbol loader (I just send a
patch to the oprofile mailing list), I get the same detail with dynamic
linking.

Josef
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]