Re: [PATCH 7/8] diff.h: extend "flags" field to 64 bits because we're out of bits

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy  <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> I renamed both "flags" and "touched_flags" fields while making this
> patch to make sure I was aware of how these flags were manipulated
> (besides DIFF_OPT* macros). So hopefully I didn't miss anything.

It is a bad taste to use user_defined_t typedef (I think it actually
is a standard violation), isn't it?

The diff-struct is not like objects where we need million copies of
in-core while running.  What do you need many more flags for?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]