Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 01:58:06PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> We forgot to terminate the payload given to write_file() with LF, >> resulting in files that end with an incomplete line. Teach the >> wrappers builtin/am uses to make sure it adds LF at the end as >> necessary. > > Is it even worth doing this step? It's completely reverted later in the > series. I understand that we do not want to hold the fix to git-am > hostage to write_file refactoring, but I don't see any reason these > cannot all graduate as part of the same topic. > > Ignore me if you really are planning on doing the first two to "maint" > and holding the others back for "master". Not really. The primary reason why this step exists and 1-2/6 make a sufficient fix by themselves is because I wasn't even sure if 3-6/6 were worth doing. As to "flags exposed to callers" vs "with and without gently", when we change the system to allow new modes of operations (e.g. somebody wants to write a binary file, or allocate more flag bits for their special case), I'd expect that we'd add a more general and verbose "write_file_with_options(path, flags, fmt, ...)"), gain experience with that function, and then possibly introduce canned thin wrappers (e.g. write_binary_file() that is a synonym to passing BINARY but not GENTLY) if the new thing proves widely useful, just like I left write_file() and write_file_gently() in as fairly common things to do. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html