Re: [PATCH v2 8/9] Support signing pushes iff the server supports it

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dave Borowitz <dborowitz@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Add a new flag --signed-if-possible to push and send-pack that sends a
> push certificate if and only if the server advertised a push cert
> nonce. If not, at least warn the user that their push may not be as
> secure as they thought.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Borowitz <dborowitz@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---

Obviously, the above description needs updating.  Here is what I've
queued tentatively.

Thanks.

commit 32d273dfabb0a70b2839971f5afff7fa86a8f4c2
Author: Dave Borowitz <dborowitz@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Wed Aug 19 11:26:46 2015 -0400

    push: support signing pushes iff the server supports it
    
    Add a new flag --sign=true (or --sign=false), which means the same
    thing as the original --signed (or --no-signed).  Give it a third
    value --sign=if-asked to tell push and send-pack to send a push
    certificate if and only if the server advertised a push cert nonce.
    
    If not, warn the user that their push may not be as secure as they
    thought.
    
    Signed-off-by: Dave Borowitz <dborowitz@xxxxxxxxxx>
    Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]