Re: Question about bare repositories

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Friday 2007 March 16 10:05, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Andy Parkins <andyparkins@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > Why does a bare repository have/need a HEAD?
>
> To mark which branch the repository owner considers the primary
> branch of the repository.  I think "git pull $URL" (i.e. without

Interesting.   So it's got a much reduced importance and sounds like it is 
mainly as guidance for cloners, etc.

> using shorthand arranged in the config nor $GIT_DIR/remotes/)
> defaults to fetching and merging HEAD from there, for example (I
> say "I think" because it's been a while I did so myself, and we
> might have broken it during the 1.5.0 process, which had a lot
> of work in that area).

Me too; I don't think I've ever used it, which is where my confusion came 
from.

Thanks for the help.


Andy
-- 
Dr Andy Parkins, M Eng (hons), MIET
andyparkins@xxxxxxxxx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]