Re: [PATCH 0/7] Flags and config to sign pushes by default

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dave Borowitz <dborowitz@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Slight digression for a question that came up during reworking the
> series: would it be reasonable to rewrite option parsing in
> builtin/send-pack.c to use the options API?

Surely.  The part of the system whose option parsing predates
parse-options may not have been converted to do so yet, but as long
as the result is correct, why not.  After all APIs were invented to
be used.

> That way we can easily
> reuse the option callback from builtin/push.c. (It would have some
> side effects like making --no-* variants work where they did not
> before; I assume that's a good thing, but it's marginally inconsistent
> with some other plumbing commands like receive-pack.)

As long as people are not deliberately feeding --no-something and
relying on it to fail, we'd be ok ;-).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]