Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] refs: make refs/worktree/* per-worktree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2015-08-13 at 13:15 -0400, Eric Sunshine wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 5:57 PM, David Turner <dturner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > diff --git a/t/t0060-path-utils.sh b/t/t0060-path-utils.sh
> > index 93605f4..28e6dff 100755
> > --- a/t/t0060-path-utils.sh
> > +++ b/t/t0060-path-utils.sh
> > +test_expect_success 'handle per-worktree refs in refs/worktree' '
> > +       git commit --allow-empty -m "initial commit" &&
> > +       git worktree add -b branch worktree &&
> > +       (
> > +               cd worktree &&
> > +               git commit --allow-empty -m "test commit"  &&
> > +               git for-each-ref | test_must_fail grep refs/worktree &&
> 
> s/test_must_fail/!/
> 
> From t/README:
> 
>    On the other hand, don't use test_must_fail for running regular
>    platform commands; just use '! cmd'.  We are not in the business
>    of verifying that the world given to us sanely works.

When I make that change, my test fails with:

FATAL: Unexpected exit with code 2

Apparently, you can't use ! in pipelines like that.  So that's why I
used test_must_fail.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]