Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/2] bisect per-worktree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 10:59 AM, Michael Haggerty <mhagger@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Either way, there's also the question of who should know how to find the
> worktree-specific references--the program that wants to access them, or
> should there be a secret invisible mapping that is done on lookup, and
> that knows the full list of references that want to be worktree-specific
> (for example, that in a linked worktree, "refs/bisect/*" should be
> silently redirected to "refs/worktree/<name>/bisect/*")?
>
> It's all a bit frightening, frankly.

I would think all work to make pluggable backends happen should allow
us to do this kind of transparent mapping. We can add a new file-based
backend with just this redirection, can't we? I haven't read the
updated refs.c though, need to do it now..
-- 
Duy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]