Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] worktrees: add die_if_shared_symref

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 3:01 PM, David Turner <dturner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Add a new function, die_if_shared_symref, which works like
> die_if_checked_out, but for all references.  Refactor
> die_if_checked_out to work in terms of die_if_shared_symref.
>
> Soon, we will use die_if_shared_symref to protect notes merges in
> worktrees.

I wonder if the diagnostic:

    'blorp' is already checked out at '/path/name/'

emitted by check_linked_checkout() needs to be adjusted for this
change. It still makes sense for die_if_checked_out(), but sounds odd
for die_if_shared_symref().

> Signed-off-by: David Turner <dturner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> diff --git a/branch.h b/branch.h
> index 58aa45f..b2fca30 100644
> --- a/branch.h
> +++ b/branch.h
> @@ -59,4 +59,11 @@ extern int read_branch_desc(struct strbuf *, const char *branch_name);
>   */
>  extern void die_if_checked_out(const char *branch);
>
> +/*
> + * Check if a symref points to a branch in the main worktree or any linked
> + * worktree and die (with a message describing its checkout location) if
> + * it is.

Ditto here. This is still talking about "branch" and "checkout",
whereas it's actually checking if a symref in some worktree already
references the given referent.

> + */
> +extern void die_if_shared_symref(const char *symref, const char *branch);

s/branch/referent/ or something?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]