Re: [PATCH v6 01/10] ref-filter: introduce 'ref_formatting_state'

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> If the act of printing an atom uses the formatting state that says
> "next one needs X", then it is responsible to clear that "next one
> needs X" part of the state, as it is the one who consumed that
> state.  E.g. if it used to say "next one needs to be padded to the
> right" before entering print_value(), then the function did that
> "padded output", then the "next one needs to be padded to the
> right" should be cleared inside print_value().

Good point. This would also reduce the risk of forgetting to reset, as
"use" and "reset" would be next to each other in the code.

-- 
Matthieu Moy
http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]