Re: "git am" and then "git am -3" regression?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> Yeah, having to worry about two implementations of "git am" is a real
> pain. If we are close on merging the builtin version, it makes sense to
> me to hold off on the am.threeway feature until that is merged. Trying
> to fix the ordering of the script that is going away isn't a good use of
> anybody's time.

So, the best option seems to be:

1) Revert d96a275 (git-am: add am.threeWay config variable, 2015-06-04)

2) Include the C port of d96a275 together with tests and docs verbatim
   from d96a275 into Paul's series.

Actually, doing 1) is probably a good idea anyway, there's no reason to
hold the release for such minor feature.

-- 
Matthieu Moy
http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]