Re: [PATCH v2] Fix detection of uname failure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2015-07-17 19:09, Charles Bailey wrote:
> From: Charles Bailey <cbailey32@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> According to POSIX specification uname must return -1 on failure and a
> non-negative value on success. Although many implementations do return 0
> on success it is valid to return any positive value for success.  In
> particular, Solaris returns 1.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Charles Bailey <cbailey32@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@xxxxxx>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]