Re: [PATCH] Change strbuf_read_file() to return ssize_t

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jul 03, 2015 at 03:59:32PM +0200, Michael Haggerty wrote:

> It is currently declared to return int, which could overflow for large
> files.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> This patch is against maint, but it also rebases against master
> without conflict.
> 
> I couldn't find any way to exploit this bug. Most callers only use
> this function for locally-generated files in the first place. And the
> correct length of the file is available in strbuf::len, so most
> callers only use the return value for a "< 0" check. And they don't do
> anything risky on the error path.

FWIW, I also looked for problem areas, but couldn't find anything
interesting. But this seems like an obviously good thing to be doing
anyway.

I also wondered if any callers needed to adjust their storage for the
return type to ssize_t (i.e., are we just moving the truncation up one
assignment). But there is only a single caller that assigns the result,
and it uses an ssize_t already.

-Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]