Re: What's the best method between merging and rebasing ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 06:11:27PM +0100, Johannes Sixt wrote:
> Xavier Maillard wrote:
> > -> D -> E -> F -> several commits from old master -> HEAD (of new master)
> > 
> > So it seems to be cherry-picks + rebase master on new HEAD but I
> > am not sure at how things are doing :)
> 
> Just to get the wording straight: You mean "reset master to new HEAD",
> not "rebase". "reset" means to point the branch identifier ("master") to
> some commit - with or without modifying the working directory
> accordingly. OTOH, "rebase" means to re-apply a string of commits on top
> of some other commit.
  
  err that was indeed a lapsus from me. Sorry for the mistake, that was
indeed what I intended to say.

-- 
·O·  Pierre Habouzit
··O                                                madcoder@xxxxxxxxxx
OOO                                                http://www.madism.org

Attachment: pgprw7YFpjhLM.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]