Re: [PATCH 3/7] pack-protocol.txt: Mark all LFs in push-cert as required

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dave Borowitz <dborowitz@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Signed-off-by: Dave Borowitz <dborowitz@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  Documentation/technical/pack-protocol.txt | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/technical/pack-protocol.txt
> b/Documentation/technical/pack-protocol.txt
> index 1386840..2d8b1a1 100644
> --- a/Documentation/technical/pack-protocol.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/technical/pack-protocol.txt
> @@ -534,6 +534,9 @@ A push certificate begins with a set of header
> lines.  After the
>  header and an empty line, the protocol commands follow, one per
>  line.
>  
> +Note that (unlike other portions of the protocol), all LFs in the
> +`push-cert` specification above MUST be present.
> +
>  Currently, the following header fields are defined:
>  
>  `pusher` ident::

I am moderately negative about this; wouldn't it make the end result
cleaner to fix the implementation?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]