Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> I also have a feeling that compared to an implementation based on >> paint_down_to_common(), including is_descendant_of(), this may be >> less precise (e.g. it would be confused with clock skew that lasts >> more than SLOP commits). If we are inventing a new helper (as >> opposed to moving an existing one), we'd probably be better off >> doing a thin wrapper around paint_down_to_common() than calling >> revision-walk machinery. > > I'll have a look and get back to you. Not as part of this series, now I know it is a straight-forward port of what we already have for "branch --merged". This series is not yet about improving counting logic but first unifying the three. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html