Hey Christian,
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 1:32 AM, Christian Couder
<christian.couder@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> After thinking about such code, I wonder if it would be better to
> support %(refname:lalign=X) instead of %(refname:lalignX).
>
> The reason why it might be interesting to require an = sign between
> "align" and the number X is that if we later want to introduce another
> option with a name that starts with "lalign", for example
> %(refname:lalignall=X) that would truncate the refname if it is bigger
> than X), we might be more backward compatible with old git versions
> that implement %(refname:lalign=X) but not %(refname:lalignall=X).
>
> We will be more backward compatible because the above call to
> starts_with() would probably be something like:
>
> if (starts_with(formatp, "lalign=")) {
>
> which means that old git versions would ignore something like "lalignall=X".
>
Good point! I agree with what you said, including an "=" sign would mean more
compatibility in the future as we could have lalign* options. Will
change this, thanks.
--
Regards,
Karthik Nayak
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html