Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] refs backend preamble

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



David Turner <dturner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> This version addresses Junio's comments on v3.

The end result makes more sense than the previous one, but did you
screw up when rewriting and/or squashing patches around the new 4/6?

I think that one has two separate changes mixed into one and does a
lot more than "this is just for clarity".  I think they should stay
separate, as the other changes are more impactful and deserve their
own justification and explanation.

Thanks.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]