On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 3:27 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Stefan Beller <sbeller@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Thanks. How did you find this (does the auto &&-chain test apply to > t/perf stuff as well)? Apparently the &&-chain tests for it as I got a warning for it while benchmarking some changes in ALLOC_GROW. (which originally should have fixed the coverity false positives, but I was side tracked wondering about performance) > > Will queue. > >> --- >> t/perf/p5310-pack-bitmaps.sh | 6 +++--- >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/t/perf/p5310-pack-bitmaps.sh b/t/perf/p5310-pack-bitmaps.sh >> index f8ed857..de2a224 100755 >> --- a/t/perf/p5310-pack-bitmaps.sh >> +++ b/t/perf/p5310-pack-bitmaps.sh >> @@ -39,14 +39,14 @@ test_expect_success 'create partial bitmap state' ' >> >> # now kill off all of the refs and pretend we had >> # just the one tip >> - rm -rf .git/logs .git/refs/* .git/packed-refs >> - git update-ref HEAD $cutoff >> + rm -rf .git/logs .git/refs/* .git/packed-refs && >> + git update-ref HEAD $cutoff && >> >> # and then repack, which will leave us with a nice >> # big bitmap pack of the "old" history, and all of >> # the new history will be loose, as if it had been pushed >> # up incrementally and exploded via unpack-objects >> - git repack -Ad >> + git repack -Ad && >> >> # and now restore our original tip, as if the pushes >> # had happened -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html