Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@xxxxxxx> writes:
> We do need two functions because we pass the pointer as callback, but
> it reads nicer with a third helper function.
>
> diff --git a/revision.c b/revision.c
> index 3ff8723..5cd08e9 100644
> --- a/revision.c
> +++ b/revision.c
> @@ -21,6 +21,9 @@
>
> volatile show_early_output_fn_t show_early_output;
>
> +static const char *name_bad;
> +static const char *name_good;
> +
> ...
> +
> +static int for_each_bisect_ref(const char *submodule, each_ref_fn fn, void *cb_data, const char *term) {
> + struct strbuf bisect_refs = STRBUF_INIT;
> + int status;
> + strbuf_addf(&bisect_refs, "refs/bisect/%s", term);
> + status = for_each_ref_in_submodule(submodule, bisect_refs.buf, fn, cb_data);
> + strbuf_release(&bisect_refs);
> + return status;
> +}
> +
> static int for_each_bad_bisect_ref(const char *submodule, each_ref_fn fn, void *cb_data)
> {
> - return for_each_ref_in_submodule(submodule, "refs/bisect/bad", fn, cb_data);
> + return for_each_bisect_ref(submodule, fn, cb_data, "bad");
> }
Shouldn't this be passing name_bad instead of "bad"?
>
> static int for_each_good_bisect_ref(const char *submodule, each_ref_fn fn, void *cb_data)
> {
> - return for_each_ref_in_submodule(submodule, "refs/bisect/good", fn, cb_data);
> + return for_each_bisect_ref(submodule, fn, cb_data, "good");
> }
Likewise.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html