Hi, > Hmm, I do not recall seeing v1 but that is OK. http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/272635 http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/272636 > The following immediately comes to mind. > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/51754/focus=51780 Thanks for the reference, amazed that I ended up using the same title! >From the thread: > Even though these lines are not digitally signed, > the intent of adding a Signed-off-by: line with your name is > that you are certifying its origin, according to the definition > of DCO (see Documentation/SubmittingPatches). This should be a > conscious act from the signer's part, and making it automatic > with a config variable that you set once and forget makes it > much less meaningful. This is a fair point. However I've seen that in practice, in some cases it's easier to consider the DCO as the rules for contributing to the entire project. In those cases people tend to use commit templates or aliases or hooks, which in practice automate the signing off act anyway. A similar concern probably applies to format.signOff option. Would be sufficient to add a note about conscious act (like format.signOff has) to the config description? -- Caio Marcelo de Oliveira Filho -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html