This is the last message I received in the series, and it's labeled 07/10. Is that normal?
> parse_address_line had not the same behavior whether the user had
had not -> did not have
> I've added the function in Git.pm as suggested. I've also added a test
> named t9000-addresses.sh (I've read the README to name tests but I'm
> not sure about the name of this test). I made a separated test
> (t9000-addresses.sh) because I think it's better not to pollute
> t9001-send-email with this.
Sounds good to me.
> About the test itself, file t/t9000-addresses.sh is just a copy/paste
> of t/t0202-gettext-perl.sh. For the perl part, the TODO tests are
> verbose: they print out commands whereas test_expect_success doesn't.
It seems it's how Test::More works. I'd keep it like this, but I have no real experience with Test::More.
> We can redirect todo_output to a variable but I've not found better...
> (Maybe someone has the solution here ?). Also there's no summary at
> the end of the test (as with other perl tests).
You can get the 1..44 at the end with
printf "1..%d\n", Test::More->builder->current_test;
This is what t9700/test.pl does.
> diff --git a/perl/Git.pm b/perl/Git.pm
> index 9026a7b..97633e9 100644
> --- a/perl/Git.pm
> +++ b/perl/Git.pm
> @@ -1584,6 +1584,73 @@ sub DESTROY {
> $self->_close_cat_blob();
> }
>
> +=item parse_mailboxes
> +
> +Returns an array of mailboxes extracted from a string.
Imperative tone => Return, not Returns.
I would have put parse_mailbox near ident_person because both functions are somehow about email.
> +BEGIN { use_ok('Git') }
> +BEGIN { use_ok('Mail::Address') }
This will fail if Mail::Address is not available. It would be better to declare Mail::Address as a prerequisite in t9000-address.sh (like what you're already doing for Test::More).
Good job, modulo these minor details, the series looks good to me.
--
Matthieu Moy
http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in