Re: [PATCH 1/2] t3404: demonstrate CHERRY_PICK_HEAD bug

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Junio,

On 2015-06-18 18:00, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@xxxxxx> writes:
> 
>>>> +	git diff seq-onto &&
>>>
>>> I am puzzled with this "diff"; what is this about?  Is it a remnant
>>> from an earlier debugging session, or is it making sure seq-onto is
>>> a valid tree-ish?
>>
>> The idea is to verify that we end up with the same tree even if we
>> exchanged the latest two patches. I can remove it if you want as it is
>> not strictly necessary, but I would like to keep it just to make sure
>> that we did not end up with an incomplete rebase.
> 
> I agree that such a verification is a very good thing to have here.
> But you would need to ask "git diff" to signal that it found no
> differences with --exit-code or --quiet, I would think.
> 
> Thanks.

Whoops! Of course... You want me to re-roll?

Ciao,
Dscho
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]