Re: [PATCH v2] git-checkout.txt: Document "git checkout <pathspec>" better

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> I think "restore" also by definition has to go back to _some_
> existing version, not a future yet-to-be-created one, so "restore to
> some previous state" is superfluous;

That's why I found "restore recorded state" not too bad.

> "restore working tree files"

Not a native, but to me "restore file" sounds like "the file is damaged,
it needs to be restored/repaired".

In any case,

  Switch branches or restore working tree files

is an improvement over the existing to me, so my bikeshedding should not
be used to reject this proposal.

-- 
Matthieu Moy
http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]