Re: [PATCH v3 05/11] ref-filter: add parse_opt_merge_filter()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 1:57 PM, Matthieu Moy
<Matthieu.Moy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Err, for-each-ref already uses it before this series, no?
>
> So, you don't need any extra option to get for-each-ref, because it is
> already there. Having these extra options is a good side effect, though.
>
> To make sure I'm clear enough, what you're doing is
>
> - add all options to for-each-ref
> - port tag.c
> - port branch.c
>
> What I'm suggesting is to prioritize this way
>
> - add all options required for tag.c
> - port tag.c
> - add all options required for branch.c
> - port branch.c
>

I meant somewhat on those lines only.  Let me clear that out.
The steps I plan to take are:
1. Move code from for-each-ref to ref-filter.
2. Add options to ref-filter which is available in tag.c and branch.c
(--points-at, --contains, --merged)
3. Add there options to for-each-ref.
4. Add options required for functioning of tag.c alone to ref-filter
5. Port tag.c
6. Add options required for functioning of branch.c alone to ref-filter
7. Port branch.c

Now why i want to complete step 2 right after 1 is so that while
porting tag.c and branch.c
I do not want to focus on making those common options available.
Because I rather
work on getting their specific options (verbose in branch.c, -n in
tag.c and so on)
working before porting over tag.c/branch.c.

>
> Not only the challenge, but also the way to validate your work. Think of
> it as a rather comprehensive set of tests that you get for free once you
> ported a command.
>
> BTW, talking about tests, did you do some coverage analysis on git
> branch and git tag? If not, I'd suggest that you do this to make sure
> that the pieces of code you're rewritting using ref-filter are well
> tested before being rewritten (a bit like Paul's work on shell -> C).
> You don't have to actually do this before porting, but it should come
> befor the port in the patch series to make sure that tests pass both the
> old and new implementation.
>

Yes good point.

I did not do a deep coverage analysis on git tag and its tests. You are right
this would be a crucial step for porting. I had a glance over the tests. Will
look into it. As for git branch I'll do that after porting tag.c over to using
ref-filter.

-- 
Regards,
Karthik Nayak
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]