Re: [PATCH v7 11/12] for-each-ref: introduce filter_refs()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/11/2015 10:30 PM, Matthieu Moy wrote:

I think it is more common to have options at the end, so I'd write it as

filter_refs(&array, &filter, FILTER_REFS_ALL | FILTER_REFS_INCLUDE_BROKEN);

(changing the declaration too, obviously)

I really like the way cmd_for_each_ref looks like now.


Ok! will reply to this mail with a small changed patch!


I thought you would make a helper function that would return a pointer
to either for_each_rawref or for_each_ref (or another later), but that
would probably be overkill.


Yea that does seem like an overkill!

--
Regards,
Karthik
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]