Antoine Delaite <antoine.delaite@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Related discussions: > > - http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/86063 > introduced bisect fix unfixed to find fix. > - http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/182398 > discussion around bisect yes/no or old/new. > - http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/199758 > last discussion and reviews Hmph, recent reviews and discussions we had here do not count? I do agree with Matthieu's review on the last round, which is still not quite addressed in this round. The current code only supports good/bad and this series merely adds another hardcoded pair old/new, which is disappointing, given that this is a very good opportunity to place an infrastructure to allow other pairs like unfixed/fixed building on top of the most generic old/new. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html