Re: [PATCH 3/4] bisect: simplify the add of new bisect terms

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> But I do not think it is a good idea to penalize the normal case by
>> writing the terms file and reading them back from it when the user
>> is bisecting with good/bad in the first place, so....
>
> No strong opinion on that, but creating one file doesn't cost much, and
> one advantage of writing it unconditionally is that it unifies bad/good
> and old/new more in the code. Just the creation of BISECT_TERMS becomes
> a special-case.

You have to handle that case anyway when I start bisection, which is
going to take very long and I had to leave for the day to come back
the next day to continue, and during the night the sysadmin updates
the installed version of Git.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]