On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 6:34 PM, Louis Stuber <stuberl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Louis Stuber <stuberl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Antoine Delaite <antoine.delaite@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- It looks like this patch applies on top of the bisect old/new series posted by Antoine. This should be stated somewhere. > git-bisect.sh | 8 +++++++- > 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/git-bisect.sh b/git-bisect.sh > index 109bd65..d3d19cb 100644 > --- a/git-bisect.sh > +++ b/git-bisect.sh > @@ -183,6 +183,10 @@ bisect_start() { > then > echo "$BISECT_BAD" >"$GIT_DIR/BISECT_TERMS" && > echo "$BISECT_GOOD" >>"$GIT_DIR/BISECT_TERMS" > + if test "$BISECT_BAD" = "new" > + then > + echo "" > "$GIT_DIR/BISECT_OLDNEWMODE" > + fi I am not sure it's worth it to have both BISECT_TERMS and BISECT_OLDNEWMODE. Also please note that I suggested to Antoine that the BISECT_BAD and BISECT_GOOD variables be renamed to something else, like I already did in some C files. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html