Re: Pack files, standards compliance, and efficiency

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 05:22:08PM +0200, Michael Haggerty wrote:
> I don't know that there would necessarily be problems, but I would worry
> about code involving structure assignment. For example, suppose the
> following snippet:
> 
>     void f(struct object_id *oid)
>     {
>         struct object_id oid_copy = *oid;
>         /* ... */
>     }
> 
> The compiler is allowed to implement the copy using instructions that
> rely on proper alignment. Such code would fail if oid is not properly
> aligned.

We use oidcpy which doesn't use object assignment.  I brought that up
previously, and Junio was opposed to doing *dest = *src.  So I don't
think this ends up being an issue.
-- 
brian m. carlson / brian with sandals: Houston, Texas, US
+1 832 623 2791 | http://www.crustytoothpaste.net/~bmc | My opinion only
OpenPGP: RSA v4 4096b: 88AC E9B2 9196 305B A994 7552 F1BA 225C 0223 B187

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]