I find that If I am doing a rebase with the intention to squash or
re-order commits, it is helpful to know the commit author.
However, the alteration that I have made to git-rebase--interactive
may not be entirely correct. Here is the change:
---
diff --git a/git-rebase--interactive.sh b/git-rebase--interactive.sh
index dc3133f..ec44d41 100644
--- a/git-rebase--interactive.sh
+++ b/git-rebase--interactive.sh
@@ -977,7 +977,7 @@ else
revisions=$onto...$orig_head
shortrevisions=$shorthead
fi
-git rev-list $merges_option --pretty=oneline --reverse --left-right
--topo-order \
+git rev-list $merges_option --pretty="%m%h [%an] %x09%s" --reverse
--left-right --topo-order \
$revisions ${restrict_revision+^$restrict_revision} | \
sed -n "s/^>//p" |
while read -r sha1 rest
--
2.4.2
The problem, as I see it is that the original '--pretty=oneline' only
produces a single line of output (of course). However, the changed
version '--pretty="%m%h [%an] %x09%s"' produces multiple lines. The
command seems to ignore the unimportant lines, and the expected output
is put into the TODO list though.
Is there a better way of providing this information, or is this still
acceptable?
_Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html