Re: [PATCH] Split sample update hook into post-receive hook

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 8 Mar 2007 04:13:13 -0500 Shawn O. Pearce wrote:

> Junio C Hamano <junkio@xxxxxxx> wrote:
[...]
> > But this is only true if you want to make it really nice.  I
> > personally feel that nobody would scream if pushing 1300 refs at
> > once (4K pages and MAX_ARG_PAGES at 32 would give 128K for
> > **argv and its strings, and one ref's worth of data is two
> > 40-digit hex plus refname, roughly 100-byte per ref) is not
> > supported and always failed.
>
> Agree completely.  I'm not too worried about it.  1300 ref push is
> just not going to really occur in practice; that is just insane.
> 30 refs, maybe.

It is not completely insane - e.g., the current klibc repository
already contains 338 tags.  Being unable to use "git push --tags" to
an initially empty repository does not look good.

So could you please switch to passing refs through stdin while we
still can do it without breaking public interfaces?

Attachment: pgpCBJjhwG6Ao.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]